Simple Living Give an outline of the attitudes to “Simple Living’ presented in texts 1, 2 and 3. Text I The first perspective on the concept “Living Simple” is from author Elizabeth Scott, “Simple Living Recession-style”, an article from the website About-corn, March 20, 2009. ‘The idea was to pare down and get rid of all the extra “stuff that we think we need, but don’t: extra belongings that clutter our homes, extra activities that pack our schedules to the hilt, extra food that lingers on our waistlines” 1 Living a simple life where you cut down on consumption, org less and make fewer stressful activities can be an alternative to the normal Western lifestyle, where you work hard and spend a lot of hard earned money on food, clothes, traveling and other things.
Elizabeth Scott creates a lot Of attention on the fact that we’re constantly blind sighted by consumerism. “In getting rid of what doesn’t really serve us, we can enjoy what’s really important in life” 2 The simple life is all about cutting everything away in one’s life that one does not need. The idea of simple lifestyle is that it basically leads to a better and healthier life where we grow our friendships ND creativity – and get a better understanding of who we really are.
With the economic crisis the world’s people become in need of simpler lifestyles to save money, therefore Elizabeth does not believe that the economic crisis is such a bad thing by all accounts. Given that people are forced to live simpler lives due to their bad economies, they automatically spend more time with their families and friends, and the possibility to start over with less stress and more meaning in their lives. ‘Mille the simplicity movement had consisted Of people who chose simplicity for its stress- relief and personal-growth infinite, now many people are opting in out of necessity: to save money! 3 So all in all Elizabeth hopes the “Simple living” recession will benefit those who are opting in for a simple life because of finances. Even though its forced upon the people, she believes the benefits are ultimately the same as for those who chooses simplicity for its perks alone (less stress, stronger relationships, and more meaning in life). In this way the economic crisis may actually bring something good with it according to Elizabethan theory about “Simple living’ Text 2 The second perspective on the concept “Simple living” is journalist Judith
Levine, she talks about her book in which Levine describes how she and her partner made it through a year without buying anything that wasn’t necessary. “If you just look inward, anti-consumerism is, like private consumption, a private enterprise. And that’s my objection to it: The way it’s constructed, any. Bay, by a lot of people – not by everyone who’s in the Voluntary Simplicity movement or the anti-consumer movement – it’s seen as something that you do on your own. You have a private reward and a spiritual reward from it, and that’s enough. 4 Judith has a very skeptical opinion awards the concept “Simple living”. Levine is tired of the “consumer” lifestyle in ASSAI, where Americans place great value and recognition in buying things, she believes this has negative consequences for the environment and causes social inequalities not only in the States but in the whole world. Even though overcompensation is dangerous and part of Aqua’s identity Levine does not believe consumption makes you morally bad, but for every purchases there are consequences as stated.
That’s why she believes that the “Simple living’ is not just about who can consume the least as an individual, but instead to always consume in the most fuel-efficient, earth-friendly and socially friendly way. It’s obvious that Levine does not agree with “anti-consumerism” because the term only focuses on the individuals and not the rest of the world, and she does not believe it’s possible to live outside capitalism, when you live in America. “For one thing, it’s hard to do. It’s too much to ask of people to stop consuming stuff all on their own.
The other thing is that it’s not enough. We need great big policy solutions that are both national and international to solve environmental and social problems. ” 5 The way to tackle the environmental degradation and the social inequalities are not through anti- consumers Or green capitalism, its through politics because the selfish mentality that “Simple living” represents is not enough. USA and the rest of the world needs big policy solutions e. G. Limitation regarding advertising. Text 3 The last perspective is from an article “Forget Shorter Showers”, written by Derrick Jensen. Because I take showers, I’m responsible for drawing down aquifers? Well, no. More than 90 percent of the water used by humans is used by agriculture and industry. ” Derrick Jensen is a firm believer that “Simple vying” does not solve the world’s problems at all. He can’t see why personal changes equal political changes. According to Jensen “Simple living” – where individuals conserves water, recycles and generally consumes less, are not enough to make a difference at all. The vast majority of the world’s consumptions come from giant companies, and therefore individual consumption is a small fish in a big sea.
Sense’s belief is that, political activism is better than the concept “Simple living” in relation to solving the high CO emissions and the excessive consumption of resources. “Would NY sane person think dumpster diving would have stopped Hitler? ” 7 He uses this quote to illustrate the importance of political activism as a tool to make a difference because we must follow the example of “real” activists who have had an impact on politics Summary of the outlines So we’ve been introduced to three different perspectives of the concept “Simple living’.
The perspectives contained both positive and negative attitudes compared to “Simple living” Text 1 Text 1 focuses on the simple life and how it’s the right path to a better and healthier life, and that the economic crisis actually could be a good thing, cause it can have the effect to push people towards living a simpler life. Text 2 Text 2 looks to “Simple living” as a positive thing, but has a more critical approach to the issue about the environmental degradation and social inequality, and how “Simple living” easily can become a very selfish project that focuses on the individual’s own little world instead of helping the world.
Text 3 Text 3 has an even more critical approach to “Simple living”. According to text 3 “Simple living’ is a good thing nonetheless it has no effect in the big picture, due to the fact that majority of the world’s consumptions and pollutions are to caused by individuals but by companies and countries. People are encouraged by the author Derrick Jensen to join together politically. The goal is to change the systems that are oppressing the people, destroying the planet and distributing the world’s goods in a very unfair way. . Taking you starting point in text 3 discuss whether “Simple Living’ is a sustainable alternative to Western lifestyle. Derrick Jensen has very strong opinions about how to solve the hot potatoes that is global warming, consumerism and social inequalities. He’s not a supporter of the “Simple living” concept. He has some very strong opposing arguments about the concept. “Even if every person in United States did everything the movie suggested, U. S. Carbon emissions would fall by only 22 percent.
Scientific consensus is that emissions must be reduced by at least 75 percent worldwide. ” 8 BOBS: The movie that’s mentioned is an environmental documentary with former Vice President and Nobel-winner environmentalist AAA Gore. In some ways can agree completely with Derrick Jensen because the big corporations are treating our planet like dirt. We people stand powerless against politicians and companies that are polluting our planet ACH day, but in a way aren’t they just supplying a demand? If we weren’t ostentatious consumers the companies would not have to mass-produce every day.
I’m not defending being an anti-consumer because as Judith Levine wrote in her article “it’s too much to ask people to stop consuming stuff all on their own” 9. Just imagine if “Simple living’ was implanted on today’s society. We would have a majority of part-time workers, who wouldn’t consume anything, because they’re all anti-consumers. The Danish economy would without a doubt collapse. If people don’t spend money as consumers, there onto be any jobs, and if there are no jobs, there isn’t a single soul to pay taxes.
And without taxes the State has no money to spend on welfare, schools, hospitals and roads etc. We live in a liberated Western society and “Simple living’ will not be sustainable method at all. Derrick Jensen and Judith Levine acknowledge that you can’t force people to live simpler lifestyles, and the way to solve this soon-to-be crisis is by getting political influence one way or another. However I’m a firm believer that one must start somewhere -? and I believe everything begins with yourself so in a way I agree with Elizabeth
Scoots “Simple living” and her theory about the “Simple living’ recession. I just think it’s a little bit too extreme, and not at all a sustainable alternative to the Western lifestyle, because we cannot fight systems or corporations as individuals – we must unite. My generation is probably the must polluting generation of all generations, and do believe I have responsibility, but it’s a shared responsibility and if we change the way the inequality, pollution and the ridiculous consumerism are affecting the world. I believe we will have a lot of generations thanking us in the future.